Recent Articles
Benefit Chart
Samuel Cheng Discussion

Lars Hode Interview
The Light Stuff

Cold Laser Info
What it does
Study Abstracts

Cold Laser News 1.1
Cold Laser News 1.2

The Cold Laser News

Our new newsletter, Cold Laser News, was created to provide in-depth articles on low level light laser medical technology. The articles quote industry experts, as well as provide industry news and information. Our first issue has two helpful articles and both basically cover the use of cold lasers to help speed the healing of sports-related injuries. We plan to feature topics of interest and more in future editions of our newsletter. We want our readers to know that our information is provided for educational purposes only. Where a medical treatment claim would seem to be implied, it is soley the opinion of the information provider quoted. You are receiving this information because you have registered with us directly at the website: To have your name removed from our distribution list, please send an email to Lois with the words "remove" as the subject.

TALK TO US! Send an email to Lois with "Newsletter Comments" in the subject line. Keep in mind that your comments--in whole or in part--may appear in upcoming editions of this newsletter. If you are interested in having your comments included in the newsletter, please include your phone number so we can confirm your response.

TELL A FRIEND! If you know of someone who would be interested in receiving this newsletter, tell him or her to sign-up here!


Vol 1, Number 2

Dear Cold Laser News Subscriber,

As I read through dozens of health newsletters and journals, I increasingly see positive and dramatic research on the benefits of using cold laser therapy.

My saved articles now fill an entire file cabinet drawer! This issue of Cold Laser News features a question and answer session with Lars Horde, a Swedish physicist and the president of the Swedish Laser Medical Society. He discusses, among other topics, how low level laser therapy (LLHT) helps smokers cope with tobacco addiction withdrawal. In addition, I interviewed David Rindge, D.O.M., L.A c, R.N., owner of Center for Cooperative Medicine in Melbourne, Florida on the differences between acupuncture and LLHT.

Before I begin the interviews, I want to wish all my readers the very best this holiday season! May we have world peace and good will!!

Lars, how does Low Level Laser Therapy help smokers end their tobacco addiction?

Laser therapy for smoking cessation is based on acupuncture. The difference is that laser light is illuminating and hence stimulating acupuncture points instead of this being done with needles.

Well, has addiction to tobacco been treated successfully with acupuncture?

Addiction to smoking has been treated with classic acupuncture for more than 60 years and with laser acupuncture for about 20 years. Both seem to be efficient.

Which is more successful in treating pain—acupuncture with needles or laser therapy? Also, which lasers are being used by people who want to stop smoking?

I can not tell if the result from a treatment with laser is more successful than a treatment with needles, but laser therapy is completely risk free and painless.

Different lasers have been used to assist people in smoking cessation. Lasers that have been used include the HeNe-Laser (633 nm), InGaAIP-laser (Indium-laser )650 nm, GaAIAs laser 610 nm, GaAs-laser (904), and KTP-laser (532 nm)

Why haven’t we heard about the positive results of laser therapy for health problems in the mainstream press?

When Professor Mester, the Hungarian physician who discovered low level light therapy, published his first article in an English journal in 1971, he advised using 1-1.5J/cm2 for wound healing, and using red lasers in the range of 5-25 milliwatts. In spite of these recommendations, laser manufacturers produced lasers such as the HE NE lasers of less than 1 milliwatt and marketed those to the medical community in the 1980s. The doses from these lasers were way below what had been recommended by Dr. Mester. So when researchers performed control studies, the very low doses affected the results and the outcome was negative. Also, researchers in those days were qualified in medical fields but not in laser therapy, so a lot of mistakes were made. In a manner of speaking, researchers in those days were looking in the wrong direction. And the general public continued to look in the same direction, thinking that laser therapy did not work. Catch 22!

So their conclusions about low level laser therapy were wrong. What does the scientific community think now?

Now, more than 30 years later, we regularly have lasers in the 1 plus milliwatt range which provides adequate dosage possibilities as it penetrates more deeply into the tissue. So your question is: Is laser therapy now well documented from a strict scientific point of view? My answer is, regrettably, NOT QUITE!! But you must understand ultrasound therapy which is one of the most used medical interventions in health medicine and NSAID’s for knee arthritis appear to be poorly documented.

Are you saying that all lasers over 1 milliwatt are much more effective?

There are more than 100 positive, double blind clinical studies, hundreds of positive in vitro studies, lots of animal studies, all pointing into one direction—it works. But this is not enough! The present “weakness” of laser therapy lies, ironically, in its strength. Since laser therapy works at a cellular level by improving the activity of cells in a reduced condition, almost any pathological situation will improve through laser therapy. But according to the medical therapy study evaluations, there is not such thing as a therapy that “does it all.” And, there is another problem: the diversity of wavelengths, powers, dosages, treatment techniques and pulsing vs direct, continuous light make it all rather confusing. There are no two studies using the exact same parameters. An improved method of evaluating laser research has been introduced and is slowly gaining acceptance so the statistical power of the existing literature can be re-evaluated. There seems to be too few experts having both a specialized medical degree and a degree in laser physics.

Lars, Thank you for your participation in this interview.


Now, we introduce David Rindge, who owns the Center for Cooperative Medicine/Healing Light Seminars, Inc.

David, in your view, which is more effective: acupuncture or low level light therapy?

Laser therapy and acupuncture are completely distinct and separate entities. Apples and oranges. Each has its own highest and best use. Both can be highly effective but are very different. Often, it may be an excellent strategy to combine both.

Acupuncture is more point specific. Acupuncture works when a practitioner inserts fine needles at key points along the body that connect to organs and affect virtually all body functions. A sharp, fine stainless steel point can target a very precise location, and effects of the stimulus may be observed on the other side of the body. In contrast, when laser light contacts tissue, it disperses over a wide area. Laser therapy might better be compare to moxibustion, the burning of an herb in Chinese medicine to warm points and channels, than to acupuncture. Acupuncture needles may serve to redirect energy, but they don’t add to it. On the other hand, laser therapy is perhaps a gentler, more supportive stimulus which adds energy to the system.

Isn’t low level laser therapy very similar to acupuncture—don’t you use the same meridian points on the body?

No. Treating widely separate points with a laser as one might with acupuncture needles is not going to give the same kind of results as acupuncture. One can certainly apply laser therapy according to the principles of Oriental medicine, but the techniques for optimal results will be very different.

Which works faster to reduce pain—low level laser therapy or acupuncture?

A single needle at an acupuncture point, small intestine 3, may immediately eliminate neck pain. The effects of laser therapy take time to build.

Thank you, David, for your input.